ashington Post columnist David Ignatius publicly praised President Donald Trump for accomplishing what he claimed former President Joe Biden could not: brokering a breakthrough in the Israel–Gaza conflict via a truce and hostage exchange. On a televised appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Ignatius highlighted Trump’s announcement of a “historic” first step—a truce between Israel and Hamas featuring the initial release of hostages and prisoners. Trump, via Truth Social, asserted that “ALL of the hostages will be released very soon,” calling the deal “unprecedented.”
Ignatius contrasted Biden’s inability to achieve such an outcome with Trump’s ability to take decisive action. He recalled that Israeli and Arab officials believed only Trump had the necessary leverage and clarity. He said that early in the conflict, Israeli officials felt disoriented and expected the U.S. to lead; Trump, according to Ignatius, provided that steadiness. He credited Trump’s private diplomacy, including sending envoys like Steve Witkoff, and the unveiling of a 20‑point peace framework, with signaling serious intent to Middle Eastern leaders.
Supporting voices reinforced the claim. Elisabeth Bumiller, a New York Times columnist, reported that Israelis she spoke to believed only Trump could push Prime Minister Netanyahu. She described the truce announcement as “very, very positive,” even while acknowledging the steep challenges ahead—particularly disarmament of Hamas and the governing future of Gaza.
Still, skepticism looms. While the agreement marks progress, critics point out that Hamas’s acceptance, full disarmament, and Gaza’s governance remain deeply complicated. Some argue it’s too soon to judge whether this truce will hold or lead to lasting peace—especially given the fragmented power dynamics and high distrust on all sides.
In sum: supporters frame the truce as a signature foreign policy win for Trump, one that Biden was unable to secure. But observers caution that its success will hinge on implementation, continued diplomacy, and the willingness of all parties to follow through on their commitments.
