Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk, once prominent figures in conservative youth politics through their organization Turning Point USA (TPUSA), have recently been at the center of a significant controversy. Owens has publicly criticized Kirk and TPUSA, alleging that the organization has compromised its principles due to external pressures from wealthy donors.

Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk, once prominent figures in conservative youth politics through their organization Turning Point USA (TPUSA), have recently been at the center of a significant controversy. Owens has publicly criticized Kirk and TPUSA, alleging that the organization has compromised its principles due to external pressures from wealthy donors.

The Alleged $2 Million Donor Controversy

In October 2025, Owens shared screenshots of private messages from a group chat involving Kirk. In these messages, Kirk reportedly expressed frustration over losing a $2 million annual donation from a Jewish donor because TPUSA refused to disinvite conservative commentator Tucker Carlson from an upcoming event. Kirk allegedly stated, “Just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won’t cancel Tucker. I’m thinking of inviting Candace.” He also mentioned, “Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.”

These revelations have sparked widespread debate within conservative circles, with some questioning the influence of donors on the organization’s direction. Turning Point USA has confirmed the authenticity of the messages but emphasized that they were private communications.

Internal Strains and Public Fallout

The fallout from these events has been significant. Turning Point USA has reportedly created a separate website to distance itself from Owens, highlighting its support for Israel and emphasizing that Owens does not represent the organization’s views.

Owens’ criticisms also touch on broader concerns about the commercialization of conservative movements. She argues that the pursuit of sponsorships and donor approval has led to a dilution of core values, turning activism into a branded product rather than a genuine ideological movement.

The Aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s Death

The controversy surrounding donor influence and organizational integrity has been further complicated by the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk in September 2025. In the wake of his death, conspiracy theories have emerged, with some speculating that his strained relationships with certain donors may have played a role. However, these theories remain unsubstantiated, and authorities have not confirmed any link between his political affiliations and his assassination.