Michael Reagan, son of former President Ronald Reagan, originally took a strongly critical view of Donald Trump, arguing that his style and rhetoric did not align with what his father stood for. In 2016, Reagan said his father “would not support this kind of campaign” when referring to Trump’s candidacy. His criticism focused on aspects like personal demeanor, Trump’s populist approach, and a perceived departure from Reagan‑era conservatism.

More recently, however, Reagan publicly backed Trump’s leadership and policies, marking what some see as an ideological shift. In a November 2024 interview, he argued that Trump was “righting the ship” and doing what the Republican Party needed today—a strong leader in challenging times.  Additionally, in March 2025 he defended Trump’s tariff policies and urged critics not to weaponize his father’s legacy against Trump, stating his father’s views had evolved over time and that historical context mattered.

This reversal underscores broader tensions in the conservative movement: the clash between traditional Reagan‑era values (emphasis on free trade, global alliances, measured governance) and modern populist conservatism (America First trade policies, national sovereignty, anti‑establishment rhetoric). Analysts note Trump’s agenda represents a shift away from Reagan’s globalist vision. Michael Reagan’s changed position signals that for some conservatives, achieving policy results (such as tariffs, deregulation, party rebuilding) may now take priority over strict adherence to previous ideological frameworks.

In essence, Michael Reagan’s journey—from opposition to support—reflects individual reevaluation of what leadership and conservative success look like in today’s Republican Party. His stance demonstrates how political legacies are contested and reframed over time, and how figures connected to established traditions may recalibrate their views in response to shifting party dynamics, policy priorities, and leadership personalities.